Cassieandra18 in collaboration with LonnieKing
In Apocalypse Now Wilson writes a letter to a hypothetical pastor pleading for a union of religion and science for the sake of the environment. Wilson, as a scientist, acknowledges the separation of the two disciplines and argues that their differences do not need to be reconciled in order to unite under a common cause. Wilson addresses the pastor because the pastor has the ability to influence a lot of people to join him in a quest to become one with science. Throughout the piece, Wilson continues addressing this pastor, but as a whole is really addressing all people in the religious and scientific communities because he wants them to know that solving these problems with the environment is serious. At one point Wilson stated that if the destruction of the environment does not stop, then most of the animals and plants on Earth will be extinct by the end of the century.
After reading the piece it becomes clear that the message applies to all people. He does not limit the scope of his essay by using qualifiers that exclude any of his readers; this is one of the many strong points of his work. As human beings, Wilson suggests, we all have a responsibility to care for and protect the environment in which we all and depend on. The political influence of the religious portion of America is also necessary for the science community to make progress in getting legislation passed. Wilson also mentions the issues of poverty and hunger that may be improved by protecting and encouraging the health of our environment. His major grounds are very convincing, his argument is clear and logical and by the end of the piece Wilson has left his readers wondering how they could ignore a message as strong as this.
Wilson identifies his thesis “Surely we can agree that each species, however inconspicuous and humble it may seem to us at this moment, is a masterpiece of biology and well worth saving.” His premises include the facts on the damage humans have caused the environment and the losses we will surely suffer if action is not taken. Wilson also introduces the tangible benefits of saving our world.
Wilson’s first ground mentions our human responsibility to take care of the environment. The warrant he provides is “[The environment] serves without discrimination the interests of all humanity. Pastor, we need your help. The creation- living nature- is in deep trouble,” which suggests that we take responsibility for the destructive path the environment is on. Wilson calls each reader out, holding us personally responsible for the deteriorating environment.
After discussing the estimated extinction rate, Wilson states another warrant. He says “If this rise continues unabated, the cost to humanity- in wealth, environmental security and quality of life- will be catastrophic,” This warrant links the extinction rate to the impending doom the human race faces if measures to protect the environment are not taken. Not only will the plants and animals of our world die out, we will too.
Wilson states explicitly that “we depend upon [the biospheres] razor- thin health for every moment of our lives,” and immediately follows with his warrant “we must be careful with the environment upon which our lives ultimately depend,” before moving on to his next point.
Wilson then mentions the wealth of scientific and medical information we will never obtain if our environment continues to be destroyed. After stating these grounds, Wilson does not connect this section of the letter with his next argument. He instead speaks directly to the reader, acknowledging a possible rebuttal forming in the readers mind. He answers this with a warrant, introducing his next point dealing with the political push the religious community would provide. “If religion and science could be united on the common ground of biological conservation, the problem might soon be solved,” and later continues, saying “an alliance between science and religion, forged in an atmosphere of mutual respect, may be the only way to protect life on earth, including, in the end, our own,” A statement which acts as a warrant linking the previous point with his next, concerning the amount of evangelical interest in protection of the environment. This also connects with Wilson’s point that an alliance between science and religion does not require identical worldviews but simply a concern for creation.
Wilson soon points out that “every great religion offers mercy and charity to the poor,” which acts as a warrant for his argument that improving the health of our environment will simultaneously improve living conditions for impoverished and hungry people of the world. This implies that if this pastor is claiming to be part of a great religion focused on improving the lives of fellow humans, he will surely be willing to get involved with Wilson’s cause. This is a very persuasive argument. Wilson challenges the religious community to do their part, not only for our world, but for fellow human beings in great need.
He then concludes that “there remains the earthborn yet transcendental obligation we are both morally bound to share,” This implies that as moral human beings living on earth, we are responsible to each other, to nature and to ourselves to take steps to improve the environment.
Wilson is very strong in his argument because he has a serious lack of qualifiers that limit the reach of his claim. He may repeatedly and explicitly call upon religious leaders but the rationale can be applied to everyone and holds us all equally responsible. Wilson connected his ideas well and supported them with data or examples and evidence that cannot be refuted. He builds his argument in a logical way, from an honest perspective and does not leave any reader out.
Wilson’s argument is similar to Ensler’s theme of community in her Ted Talk piece. The idea that we are all in this together and that we need to take responsibility for each other as well as the world around us is a powerful statement. In a way, they both call out every member of the human race to actively participate in a collective change for the better. Wilson mentions the way petty differences divide a population that is deeply connected. Ensler also discusses this idea in her Ted Talk. Both imply the inherent connection between the environment, nature, the world, and humans. We are responsible for the care of the Earth and dependent on its good health for our own. Conversely, division within the human family only leads to destruction. When united, people are capable of amazing things.
Work Cited
Wilson, Edward O. Apocalypse Now. The New Republic. 22 August 2006. Web.
15 October 2011. <http://alaninvermont.org/Environment/Apocalypse_Now.html>